2014 "Leads on the Lake" Sectional

November 7-9

EVENT>Fri Eve 299er Pairs      |SESSION>             |SECTION> J N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------,-----------------
DATE>November 7, 2014   |SANCTION>S1411036  | 11/08/2014 20:21|EVENT CODE>07L2
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,--- -----------------
CITY>Houston         |RATING>Sectional                    |MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   72.0 |TOP>   6 |MP LIMITS>300/200/100    |TOURN>Leads On The Lake
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT D=8/E=7/F=2                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-D|Rnk-E|Rnk-F|Rnk-D|Rnk-E|Rnk-F| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Shirley Kingsley       Stella Gallaher          E   3     3     .   |   1     1     .     81.00  56.25  1.02(OD)
 2 Marcia Lindsey         Nancy Shomette           F   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     56.50  39.24
 3 Pearl Younger          Jean Rachner             E   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     73.00  50.69
 4 Theresa Devereux       Phyllis Chaney           E   .     .     .   |   3     3     .     75.00  52.08  0.46(SD)
 5 Karen Jones            Kathryn Nettles          F   .     .     .   |   .     .     1     66.50  46.18  0.51(SF)
 6 Linda Windham          Michael Windham          E   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     72.50  50.35
 7 James Meade            Carol Meade              E   4     4     .   |   2     2     .     79.50  55.21  0.77(OD)


                                          Totals                                            504.00


                        **PAIRS**
BOARD     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8
  /
   1>     2     4-    1     3     6     0     4-
        -400  -100  -430  -300    50  -460  -100   ----

   2>     6     1     2     5     0     3-    3-
         100  -400  -200    50 -1700  -120  -120   ----

   3>     6     2-    2-    2-    2-    2-    2-
        -650  -680  -680  -680  -680  -680  -680   ----

   4>     2-    5     2-    0     2-    2-    6
        -100   620  -100  -200  -100  -100   650   ----

   5>     2-    0     5     5     5     1     2-
          50   -90   100   100   100  PASS    50   ----

   6>     3     0     5     1-    6     4     1-
        -130  -180   100  -150   200  -120  -150   ----

   7>     4-     -    3     6     2      -    4-
         100  -620  -170   200  -200  -620   100   ----

   8>     0     3-    1     3-    3-    6     3-
        -120    50   -90    50    50   100    50   ----

   9>     2-    2-    1     6     0     4     5
         -50   -50   -90   400  -100   140   300   ----

  10>     6      -    2-    4-     -    4-    2-
         100  -660  -630  -620  -660  -620  -630   ----

  11>     4-    4-    0     2-    1     6     2-
        -100  -100  -430  -150  -300    50  -150   ----

  12>     5-    3-    5-    3-    1-    0     1-
         150   100   150   100    50   -80    50   ----

  13>     5     0     2     2     5     2     5
         300   110   140   140   300   140   300   ----

  14>     2     4-    0     2     6     2     4-
          50   100   -50    50   150    50   100   ----

  15>     6     0     1     4     4     2     4
         200  -200  -100   170   170   140   170   ----

  16>     0     1     6     2     4     5     3
        -180  -110   300  -100  PASS   100   -50   ----

  17>     4-    1-    6     4-    0     1-    3
         170   130   400   170   -50   130   150   ----

  18>     3     5     6     1-    4     1-    0
        -430  -100    50  -450  -420  -450  -460   ----

  19>     2     4     2     0     2     5-    5-
        -620  -140  -620  -650  -620   100   100   ----

  20>     4-    0     4-    4-    1     4-    2
         690   150   690   690   600   690   660   ----

  21>     3-    1     5     3-    1     1     6
         140  -100   170   140  -100  -100   630   ----

  22>     1     4-    4-    1     1     4-    4-
        -200  -150  -150  -200  -200  -150  -150   ----

  23>     2     4-    0     4-    2     6     2
        -100   130  -200   130  -100   150  -100   ----

  24>     2-    2-    5     2-    6     2-    0
         -50   -50    50   -50   100   -50  -150   ----



EVENT>Fri Eve 299er Pairs      |SESSION>             |SECTION> J E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------,-----------------
DATE>November 7, 2014   |SANCTION>S1411036  | 11/08/2014 20:21|EVENT CODE>07L2
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,--- -----------------
CITY>Houston         |RATING>Sectional                    |MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   72.0 |TOP>   6 |MP LIMITS>300/200/100    |TOURN>Leads On The Lake
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT D=8/E=8/F=5                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-D|Rnk-E|Rnk-F|Rnk-D|Rnk-E|Rnk-F| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Odis Nolte             Tonya McNabb             E   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     74.38  51.65
 2 Jade Ngai              Aubang Hu                F   5     5     2   |   3     3     2     76.11  52.85  0.89(OF)
 3 Mary Ellen Vail        Suzanne Houck            E   2     2     .   |   2     2     .     82.29  57.15  1.37(OD)
 4 Gail Wood              Jo Anne Knodel           E   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     69.62  48.35
 5 Bob Yelli              Judith Hughes            F   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     64.48  44.78
 6 Millie Perner          Gayle Watkins            F   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     56.86  39.49
 7 Kimberly Sunderland    Stacy Lodden             F   1     1     1   |   1     1     1     86.00  59.72  1.82(OD)
 8 Adrianne Hunt          Mary Scalisi             F   .     .     3   |   .     .     .     66.95  46.49  0.67(OF)

                                          Totals                                            576.69


                        **PAIRS**
BOARD     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8
  /
   1>     4     0     1-    6     5     1-    3
         400   -50   100   460   430   100   300   ----

   2>     0     6     5     2-    4     2-    1
        -100  1700   400   120   200   120   -50   ----

   3>     0     3-    3-    3-    3-    3-    3-
         650   680   680   680   680   680   680   ----

   4>     3-    1     3-    3-    0     6           3-
         100  -620   100   100  -650   200   ----  100

   5>     1     6     5     1     3-    1           3-
        -100    90  PASS  -100   -50  -100   ----  -50

   6>     0     6     2     1     4-    4-          3
        -200   180   120  -100   150   150   ----  130

   7>     5-    5-    3     1-    0           1-    4
         620   620   170  -100  -200   ---- -100   200

   8>     2-    0     5     2-    2-          6     2-
         -50  -100    90   -50   -50   ----  120   -50

   9>     3-    2     5     1     0           3-    6
          50  -140    90  -300  -400   ----   50   100

  10>     1-    3-    3-    1-          0     5-    5-
         620   630   630   620   ---- -100   660   660

  11>     0     6     3-    3-          1-    5     1-
         -50   430   150   150   ----  100   300   100

  12>     6      -    4-    2-           -    4-    2-
          80  -150   -50  -100   ---- -150   -50  -100

  13>     4     1     4           1     1     6     4
        -140  -300  -140   ---- -300  -300  -110  -140

  14>     6     1-    4           4     0     1-    4
          50  -100   -50   ----  -50  -150  -100   -50

  15>     5     2     2           0     2     6     4
         100  -170  -170   ---- -200  -170   200  -140

  16>   3.58  3.60        5.92  2.42  4.75  1.25  0.08
          50  AVE+   ----  180  PASS   110  -100  -300

  17>     3     1-          1-    6     4-    4-    0
        -150  -170   ---- -170    50  -130  -130  -400

  18>     6     4-          3     2     1     4-    0
         460   450   ----  430   420   100   450   -50

  19>     6           4     4     2      -    4      -
         650   ----  620   620   140  -100   620  -100

  20>     1-          1-    5     6     1-    1-    4
        -690   ---- -690  -600  -150  -690  -690  -660

  21>     2-          2-    5     5     5     1     0
        -140   ---- -140   100   100   100  -170  -630

  22>           5     5     1-    1-    1-    1-    5
         ----  200   200   150   150   150   150   200

  23>           4     4     1-    0     6     4     1-
         ----  100   100  -130  -150   200   100  -130

  24>           3-    0     3-    3-    1     6     3-
         ----   50  -100    50    50   -50   150    50
Fri Eve 299er Pairs, November 7, 2014

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
8 7 5
Q 10 8 7 6 3 2
J 9
5
J 10 3 2
K Q 10 8 6 4 3
4 3
N
WE
S
A 9
K J 5 4
A 2
K Q J 9 7
K Q 6 4
A 9
7 5
A 10 8 6 2

E 4N; W 3N; E 5; W 4; EW 2; NS 2; E 3; W 2; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 W−1506.000.005-Jones-Nettles vs 2-Ngai-Hu
4 N−21004.501.502-Lindsey-Shomette vs 3-Vail-Houck
3 N−21004.501.507-Meade-Meade vs 6-Perner-Watkins
3 ×N−23003.003.004-Devereux-Chaney vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
3 NTE34002.004.001-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
3 NTE44301.005.003-Younger-Rachner vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
5 NTE54600.006.006-Windham-Windham vs 4-Wood-Knodel

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
5
7 3
Q J 10 7 6
K J 10 9 6
A 7 4 3
A K 5
A 8 4
A 4 3
N
WE
S
Q 8 2
J 6 2
K 9 5 3
Q 8 5
K J 10 9 6
Q 10 9 8 4
2
7 2

EW 2N; E 2; EW 2; W 1; EW 1; EW 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−21006.000.001-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
3 NTE−1505.001.004-Devereux-Chaney vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
2 NTE21203.502.506-Windham-Windham vs 4-Wood-Knodel
1 NTW21203.502.507-Meade-Meade vs 6-Perner-Watkins
2 S−22002.004.003-Younger-Rachner vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
3 NTN−44001.005.002-Lindsey-Shomette vs 3-Vail-Houck
4 ×N−617000.006.005-Jones-Nettles vs 2-Ngai-Hu

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
A 5
Q 8 6
9 8
K J 8 6 5 3
Q 7 4 3
A K J 7 5
A Q J 3
N
WE
S
K J 10 8 6 2
3
4 2
A 10 7 4
9
10 9 4 2
K 10 7 6 5
Q 9 2

EW 6; E 4N; EW 4; EW 3; W 1N; EW 1; Par −1430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E56506.000.001-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
5 E66802.503.502-Lindsey-Shomette vs 3-Vail-Houck
4 E66802.503.503-Younger-Rachner vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
4 E66802.503.504-Devereux-Chaney vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
4 W66802.503.505-Jones-Nettles vs 2-Ngai-Hu
4 E66802.503.506-Windham-Windham vs 4-Wood-Knodel
4 E66802.503.507-Meade-Meade vs 6-Perner-Watkins

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
A Q J 6
Q J 6
A K Q
Q 8 4
10 7 5
K 2
9 8 4 3 2
K J 6
N
WE
S
8 3
10 8 7 4
10 6 5
9 5 3 2
K 9 4 2
A 9 5 3
J 7
A 10 7

NS 5N; NS 5; NS 5; NS 4; NS 4; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N56506.000.007-Meade-Meade vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
4 N46205.001.002-Lindsey-Shomette vs 2-Ngai-Hu
6 N−11002.503.501-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
6 NTN−11002.503.503-Younger-Rachner vs 4-Wood-Knodel
6 NTN−11002.503.505-Jones-Nettles vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
6 N−11002.503.506-Windham-Windham vs 3-Vail-Houck
6 NTN−22000.006.004-Devereux-Chaney vs 6-Perner-Watkins

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
Q 7 6
A Q J
10 7 6
J 10 9 3
K 9 8
8 6 5 2
A 5 3 2
8 4
N
WE
S
A 10 5 3
K 9 7
J 8 4
A Q 6
J 4 2
10 4 3
K Q 9
K 7 5 2

E 1N; EW 1; EW 1; EW 1; NS 1; Par −90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W−21005.001.003-Younger-Rachner vs 4-Wood-Knodel
2 W−21005.001.004-Devereux-Chaney vs 6-Perner-Watkins
1 NTW−21005.001.005-Jones-Nettles vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
1 NTW−1502.503.501-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
3 NTW−1502.503.507-Meade-Meade vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
PassPass1.005.006-Windham-Windham vs 3-Vail-Houck
1 NTW1900.006.002-Lindsey-Shomette vs 2-Ngai-Hu

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
10 8 6
K Q 5
J 8 2
A Q 10 7
A J
9 6 3
Q 9 5 3
K 8 6 3
N
WE
S
K 7 4 3 2
J 8 4 2
10 6
J 5
Q 9 5
A 10 7
A K 7 4
9 4 2

NS 3N; NS 2; NS 3; NS 2; NS 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−22006.000.005-Jones-Nettles vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
4 NTW−11005.001.003-Younger-Rachner vs 4-Wood-Knodel
2 NTW21204.002.006-Windham-Windham vs 3-Vail-Houck
2 E41303.003.001-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
2 W51501.504.504-Devereux-Chaney vs 6-Perner-Watkins
2 W51501.504.507-Meade-Meade vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
2 NTE41800.006.002-Lindsey-Shomette vs 2-Ngai-Hu

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
Q J 9
9
J 9 7 6 4 2
Q 8 5
8 3
A K J 7 4
A Q 10
A J 6
N
WE
S
10 7
10 8 6 5 3
K
10 7 4 3 2
A K 6 5 4 2
Q 2
8 5 3
K 9

EW 4; EW 4; NS 2; EW 1N; NS 2; Par −500: NS 4×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 W−22006.000.004-Devereux-Chaney vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
5 W−11004.501.501-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
4 W−11004.501.507-Meade-Meade vs 4-Wood-Knodel
3 W41703.003.003-Younger-Rachner vs 3-Vail-Houck
4 S−22002.004.005-Jones-Nettles vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
4 W46200.505.502-Lindsey-Shomette vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
4 W46200.505.506-Windham-Windham vs 2-Ngai-Hu

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
10 8 6
8 5 4
A 6 3
9 8 7 2
7 3
K Q 10 3 2
K Q 9 7
6 3
N
WE
S
A 9 4 2
6
J 8 4 2
A K Q 5
K Q J 5
A J 9 7
10 5
J 10 4

EW 5; EW 3; EW 2N; EW 2; EW 2; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTW−21006.000.006-Windham-Windham vs 2-Ngai-Hu
1 NTE−1503.502.502-Lindsey-Shomette vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
1 NTW−1503.502.504-Devereux-Chaney vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
1 NTW−1503.502.505-Jones-Nettles vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
2 W−1503.502.507-Meade-Meade vs 4-Wood-Knodel
1 NTE1901.005.003-Younger-Rachner vs 3-Vail-Houck
1 NTW21200.006.001-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
K Q 6 2
A J 10 9 3
A K 3
6
J 10 5
7 6 5
9 8
K Q 8 4 3
N
WE
S
A 9 8 4
K 4 2
Q J 5 4
A J
7 3
Q 8
10 7 6 2
10 9 7 5 2

N 2; EW 1; NS 1; S 1; EW 1; Par +90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−44006.000.004-Devereux-Chaney vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
1 NTE−33005.001.007-Meade-Meade vs 4-Wood-Knodel
3 N31404.002.006-Windham-Windham vs 2-Ngai-Hu
2 N−1502.503.501-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
2 N−1502.503.502-Lindsey-Shomette vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
1 NTE1901.005.003-Younger-Rachner vs 3-Vail-Houck
2 N−21000.006.005-Jones-Nettles vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
8 4 3 2
Q J 4
9 8 5 2
9 7
Q 7
K 2
Q J 10 6
K Q 10 3 2
N
WE
S
A K J 6 5
A 9 3
7 4
J 6 4
10 9
10 8 7 6 5
A K 3
A 8 5

EW 4N; EW 4; EW 4; EW 2; EW 1; Par −630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−11006.000.001-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 6-Perner-Watkins
4 E46204.501.504-Devereux-Chaney vs 4-Wood-Knodel
4 E46204.501.506-Windham-Windham vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
3 NTW46302.503.503-Younger-Rachner vs 2-Ngai-Hu
3 NTE46302.503.507-Meade-Meade vs 3-Vail-Houck
3 NTE56600.505.502-Lindsey-Shomette vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
3 NTE56600.505.505-Jones-Nettles vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
K 8 7 6
4 2
10 9 6
Q J 6 4
10 2
5
K J 8 4 3
9 8 7 3 2
N
WE
S
Q J 9 5 3
A Q J 8
A 2
A 5
A 4
K 10 9 7 6 3
Q 7 5
K 10

EW 4; EW 2N; EW 2; EW 2; EW 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E−1506.000.006-Windham-Windham vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
3 ×S−11004.501.501-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 6-Perner-Watkins
3 S−21004.501.502-Lindsey-Shomette vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
2 NTE31502.503.504-Devereux-Chaney vs 4-Wood-Knodel
3 S−31502.503.507-Meade-Meade vs 3-Vail-Houck
2 ×S−23001.005.005-Jones-Nettles vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
3 NTW44300.006.003-Younger-Rachner vs 2-Ngai-Hu

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
Q
10 7 6 4 3
A 10 7 2
A 9 7
K 10 7 2
A Q J 2
9 8 6
Q 5
N
WE
S
A 9 8 4
K 9 5
K Q 5 4
J 6
J 6 5 3
8
J 3
K 10 8 4 3 2

EW 3; EW 2; NS 3; EW 2; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−31505.500.501-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 6-Perner-Watkins
4 E−31505.500.503-Younger-Rachner vs 2-Ngai-Hu
4 E−21003.502.502-Lindsey-Shomette vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
4 E−21003.502.504-Devereux-Chaney vs 4-Wood-Knodel
4 E−1501.504.505-Jones-Nettles vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
4 E−1501.504.507-Meade-Meade vs 3-Vail-Houck
1 W1800.006.006-Windham-Windham vs 1-Nolte-McNabb

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
8 4 2
4 3
Q 9 6
A K 10 8 7
Q 7
J 5 2
A K J 10
Q 6 5 2
N
WE
S
J 10 6
A Q 8 7 6
8 4 2
9 4
A K 9 5 3
K 10 9
7 5 3
J 3

NS 3; NS 2N; NS 3; EW 1; NS 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−33005.001.001-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
3 E−33005.001.005-Jones-Nettles vs 6-Perner-Watkins
2 NTW−33005.001.007-Meade-Meade vs 2-Ngai-Hu
2 S31402.004.003-Younger-Rachner vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
3 S31402.004.004-Devereux-Chaney vs 3-Vail-Houck
3 S31402.004.006-Windham-Windham vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
2 S21100.006.002-Lindsey-Shomette vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
J 10 2
Q 8 7 4 3
A J 6
10 6
Q 5 3
A K
K 9 7 5 2
8 7 3
N
WE
S
A K 9 6 4
J
10 8 4 3
Q J 5
8 7
10 9 6 5 2
Q
A K 9 4 2

NS 3; EW 1N; EW 2; NS 2; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−31506.000.005-Jones-Nettles vs 6-Perner-Watkins
5 ×W−11004.501.502-Lindsey-Shomette vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
4 E−21004.501.507-Meade-Meade vs 2-Ngai-Hu
3 E−1502.004.001-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
3 E−1502.004.004-Devereux-Chaney vs 3-Vail-Houck
4 E−1502.004.006-Windham-Windham vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
4 N−1500.006.003-Younger-Rachner vs 1-Nolte-McNabb

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A K 6 5 4
Q
J 7 5 3
K 9 2
9 8 2
9 8 6 3
A 10 8 4
J 5
N
WE
S
J 7
A K J 4
Q 2
10 8 7 6 4
Q 10 3
10 7 5 2
K 9 6
A Q 3

NS 4; NS 2N; NS 2; EW 1; NS 1; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N52006.000.001-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
2 N41704.002.004-Devereux-Chaney vs 3-Vail-Houck
3 N41704.002.005-Jones-Nettles vs 6-Perner-Watkins
3 N41704.002.007-Meade-Meade vs 2-Ngai-Hu
3 N31402.004.006-Windham-Windham vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
4 N−11001.005.003-Younger-Rachner vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
4 N−22000.006.002-Lindsey-Shomette vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
A Q 9
J 10 9 6 3
K 5 3
5 3
6 4 2
Q
J 9 7
K Q J 10 8 6
N
WE
S
J 7 3
A K 7 5 4
Q 8 2
9 4
K 10 8 5
8 2
A 10 6 4
A 7 2

NS 3; NS 2; NS 1N; NS 2; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTE−33006.000.083-Younger-Rachner vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
3 W−11005.001.256-Windham-Windham vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
PassPass4.002.425-Jones-Nettles vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
2 NTS−1503.003.587-Meade-Meade vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
3 S−2-100AVE+2.003.604-Devereux-Chaney vs 2-Ngai-Hu
3 W31101.004.752-Lindsey-Shomette vs 6-Perner-Watkins
1 NTW41800.005.921-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 4-Wood-Knodel

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
8 5 4 2
10
K 10 8 5
A K 8 7
A J 10 7
Q J 8 5 3
4
J 9 6
N
WE
S
K Q 9 3
4 2
J 6 2
Q 10 5 4
6
A K 9 7 6
A Q 9 7 3
3 2

NS 3N; NS 5; NS 2; EW 1; NS 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 S54006.000.003-Younger-Rachner vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
3 S61704.501.501-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 4-Wood-Knodel
2 S61704.501.504-Devereux-Chaney vs 2-Ngai-Hu
1 NTN31503.003.007-Meade-Meade vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
3 S41301.504.502-Lindsey-Shomette vs 6-Perner-Watkins
2 S41301.504.506-Windham-Windham vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
5 S−1500.006.005-Jones-Nettles vs 5-Yelli-Hughes

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
J
9 8 6 4 3
J 7
A 9 8 7 2
A K 9 8 5
A K Q 7
Q 6
K 5
N
WE
S
Q 10 7
J 5 2
K 5 3 2
J 6 3
6 4 3 2
10
A 10 9 8 4
Q 10 4

EW 4N; EW 4; EW 2; NS 2; EW 1; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 W−1506.000.003-Younger-Rachner vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
3 N−11005.001.002-Lindsey-Shomette vs 6-Perner-Watkins
4 W44204.002.005-Jones-Nettles vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
3 NTW44303.003.001-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 4-Wood-Knodel
4 E54501.504.504-Devereux-Chaney vs 2-Ngai-Hu
5 W54501.504.506-Windham-Windham vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
3 NTE54600.006.007-Meade-Meade vs 1-Nolte-McNabb

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
Q J 6 4
7
9 8 6 5 3
Q 9 7
9 7 3
K 10 9 6
K 2
A K 5 2
N
WE
S
A K 5
A J 5 4 2
7 4
10 8 6
10 8 2
Q 8 3
A Q J 10
J 4 3

EW 5; EW 4N; EW 5; EW 2; NS 1; Par −650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−11005.500.506-Windham-Windham vs 6-Perner-Watkins
4 E−11005.500.507-Meade-Meade vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
3 E31404.002.002-Lindsey-Shomette vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
4 E46202.004.001-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 3-Vail-Houck
4 E46202.004.003-Younger-Rachner vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
4 E46202.004.005-Jones-Nettles vs 4-Wood-Knodel
4 E56500.006.004-Devereux-Chaney vs 1-Nolte-McNabb

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
A 7 5
K 9
A 5 4
K 10 8 7 5
J 10 8
Q J 8 6 4
10 3 2
J 4
N
WE
S
Q 9 6 4
10 3 2
J 8 7
A 9 6
K 3 2
A 7 5
K Q 9 6
Q 3 2

NS 6N; NS 6; NS 6; NS 3; NS 2; Par +1440

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS66904.501.501-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 3-Vail-Houck
3 NTS66904.501.503-Younger-Rachner vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
3 NTS66904.501.504-Devereux-Chaney vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
3 NTS66904.501.506-Windham-Windham vs 6-Perner-Watkins
3 NTS56602.004.007-Meade-Meade vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
3 NTN36001.005.005-Jones-Nettles vs 4-Wood-Knodel
3 N51500.006.002-Lindsey-Shomette vs 5-Yelli-Hughes

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
Q 6 3 2
K 9
9 8 5 3
K J 3
A 7 4
J 7
K Q 4 2
9 8 5 2
N
WE
S
J 10 9 8 5
A 8 2
6
Q 10 7 4
K
Q 10 6 5 4 3
A J 10 7
A 6

S 3; NS 2N; N 2; NS 3; EW 1; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN46306.000.007-Meade-Meade vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
3 S41705.001.003-Younger-Rachner vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
3 S31403.502.501-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 3-Vail-Houck
2 S31403.502.504-Devereux-Chaney vs 1-Nolte-McNabb
3 S−11001.005.002-Lindsey-Shomette vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
4 S−11001.005.005-Jones-Nettles vs 4-Wood-Knodel
3 S−11001.005.006-Windham-Windham vs 6-Perner-Watkins

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
Q 10 9 6 5 3
Q 9 3
K 10 9 4
A 10 9 8 6 3
K J 4
A 2
5 3
N
WE
S
4 2
A 7 2
K J 10 8
J 8 7 2
K Q J 7 5
8
7 6 5 4
A Q 6

EW 3; EW 2N; EW 1; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTN−31504.501.502-Lindsey-Shomette vs 4-Wood-Knodel
2 S−31504.501.503-Younger-Rachner vs 6-Perner-Watkins
2 NTN−31504.501.506-Windham-Windham vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
3 N−31504.501.507-Meade-Meade vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
2 S−42001.005.001-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 2-Ngai-Hu
2 S−42001.005.004-Devereux-Chaney vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
2 S−42001.005.005-Jones-Nettles vs 3-Vail-Houck

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
K 2
K 5 3
A 10 8 7 3
J 8 5
Q J 9 8 6 3
Q J 10
6 4 3 2
N
WE
S
7 4
9 8 7 2
K Q 9 2
10 9 7
A 10 5
A 6 4
J 6 5 4
A K Q

NS 3N; NS 3; NS 4; NS 2; NS 3; Par +600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S51506.000.006-Windham-Windham vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
3 S41304.501.502-Lindsey-Shomette vs 4-Wood-Knodel
4 S41304.501.504-Devereux-Chaney vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
4 S−11002.004.001-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 2-Ngai-Hu
3 NTS−11002.004.005-Jones-Nettles vs 3-Vail-Houck
3 NTS−11002.004.007-Meade-Meade vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden
5 S−22000.006.003-Younger-Rachner vs 6-Perner-Watkins

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
J 9 8 6 3
8 2
10 8 3
Q 10 5
Q 10 7 5
J 7 6
A 5
J 8 4 2
N
WE
S
A 4 2
A K 5 4 3
9 7 6
7 3
K
Q 10 9
K Q J 4 2
A K 9 6

EW 2; NS 3; NS 2; EW 1; Par +100: EW 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−21006.000.005-Jones-Nettles vs 3-Vail-Houck
3 E−1505.001.003-Younger-Rachner vs 6-Perner-Watkins
3 S−1502.503.501-Kingsley-Gallaher vs 2-Ngai-Hu
3 S−1502.503.502-Lindsey-Shomette vs 4-Wood-Knodel
3 S−1502.503.504-Devereux-Chaney vs 8-Hunt-Scalisi
3 S−1502.503.506-Windham-Windham vs 5-Yelli-Hughes
2 NTS−31500.006.007-Meade-Meade vs 7-Sunderland-Lodden